


The Sailor is back from A voyage to the TAJ MAHAL.
Taj mahal is huge, splendid and many other superlatives that one can think of.
After all it is, the
the BIGGEST ERECTION OF A MAN FOR A WOMAN.
Jokes apart, i felt like a waste. how how how couldnt i think of doing any such thing for my people.
Ozymandias thought he would live for ever but his statue was broken, the crown shattered. but the taj mahal is a different issue. dont know when the smoke and dust of today's world is going to destroy it, but as long as it stands, the message is out in the clear. literally two eyes aint enough to see it. it is that huge. it definitely deserves to be on the list of 'wonders of the world'
But, did you know??? like the Da Vinci Code, we have The TAJ Mahal conspiracy. before anyone jumps up to refute me, disclaimer: this is The Sailor's personal opinion. arrived at the same after some researh.
the story goes thus ;
No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the
whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says
the
Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of
Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya) . In the course of his research O
ak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from
then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle,
Badshahnama,
Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra
was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur
still
retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for
surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a
burial place for
dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.
For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried
in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says
the term "Mahal" has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries
from Afghanisthan to Algeria. "The unusual explanation that the term Taj
Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani, " he writes.
Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's
name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he
claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak
also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created
by
court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists . Not a
single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.
Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates
Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by
Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a
few
samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed
that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan
Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's
death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no
reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an
English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the
Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.
Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies
that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple
rather
than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed
since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak
asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects
commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples . Fearing political
backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Prof. Oak's book
withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the
first edition with dire consequences for further reading go here
WHAT THE SAILOR BELIEVES IS THAT, THE LAND ON WHICH THE TAJ IS BUILT, WAS INDEED TAKEN FROM A HINDU KING. IT MIGHT JUST BE A POSSIBILTY, THERE WAS A TEMPLE ON THE SAME GROUND BEFORE; A SKELETON ARCHITECTURE OF WHICH MIGHT BE RELFECTED IN THE TAJ. ALSO SOME OF THE MOTIFS AND PATTERNS ON THE WALLS ARE UN-MUGHAL LIKE. SO ONE CAN NEVER SAY...
BUT CONSPIRACY OR NOT , THE
TAJ WILL CONTINUE TO INSPIRE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE
photographs courtesy PAPPU
----------------
Listening to:
ALADIN- A WHOLE NEW WORLDvia FoxyTunes